We strongly recommend leaving comments, however comments with abusive words, bullying, personal attacks of any type will be moderated.Įmail me when someone replies to this comment.
Write your thoughts in our old-fashioned comment. App requirements Intel 64 OS X Try our new feature and write a detailed review about Audirvana. Size Downloads Try our new feature and write a detailed review about Audirvana Studio. Legacy Audirvana database import: add automatic fix for missing values that were causing the import to restart. Reliability improvement against corrupted audio files. Otherwise I use the Qobuz player for convenience. It’s the pricing, not necessarily the subscription model that’s the critical decision for developers, and their customers. So, if push comes to shove I’ll ditch Audirvana. Qobuz on its own provides significant value for me.Īudirvana does not alone in comparison. The move to a subscriber model doesn’t bother me. I have used Audirvana for years, with iTunes and Qobuz. Audirvana Studio is just fine! Very pleased after the upgrade. But there seems to be a custom use of the application that Taiko has engineered for their device.I use it for Qobuz. I know that a lot of Taiko Extreme users are happy with a Roon implementation using HQPlayer. But it has its own interface problems, specifically around remotely controlling the software from a laptop. But the interface can't compete with Roon. Sound quality is better than Roon on my system (even with HQPlayer as output, strangely). Tried Euphony Stylus about a year ago on a dedicated server.
Have used it in a single server setup, dual servers and a few tweaks in between. I started using Roon a couple of years ago.
But given the rapid pace of change in this domain I thought it would be useful to see what others are discovering. This is a common journey in our particular endeavor and not unvisited topic.
0 kommentar(er)
